D and S Blog image



Subscribe to Dollars & Sense magazine.

Recent articles related to the financial crisis.

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

 

Home Sales At 7-Year Low

by Dollars and Sense

The latest numbers show that home sales are still in the tank throughout the country, despite mortgage rates that are at near 50-year lows.

From Reuters:

Pending sales of existing U.S. homes dropped to a seven-year low in November, data showed on Tuesday, as rising job losses and a deepening economic recession kept potential house buyers on the sidelines.

The National Association of Realtors Pending Home Sales Index, based on contracts signed in November, dropped 4.0 percent to 82.3, the lowest level since the series started in 2001. That was worse than economists' expectations for a 0.1 percent drop.

November's reading was 5.3 percent lower than a year-ago and October's pending home sales index was revised down to 85.7.

"Mounting job losses and very weak consumer confidence deterred home buyers from signing contracts in November," said Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist. "December's housing market activity could be comparably lower due to ongoing problems in the economy."

Read the rest of the story here.

Labels: ,

 

1/06/2009 12:53:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Monday, January 05, 2009

 

Report from the ASSA

by Dollars and Sense

A quick report from the 2009 meetings of the Allied Social Sciences Association (as the economists grandiosely call their meetings) in San Francisco. This will have to be short, since I am on the clock at an Internet café one block from the San Francisco Hilton at Union Square, not having brought my laptop with me on the trip. Plus I have to get back to our booth at the book exhibit to haggle with someone from the company that runs the book exhibit about the fact that two of our boxes never arrived at the booth, even though we shipped them at great expense via UPS. Ah, professional meetings!

My panel went well on Saturday. It was sponsored by the Union for Radical Political Economics (URPE), and the title of the panel was Using Economics for Social Change: Five Organizations Report. The other panelists were Heidi Hartmann of the Institute for Women's Policy Research, Larry Mishel of the Economic Policy Institute, Kevin Danaher of Global Exchange, and David Barkin of Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco in Mexico. The panel was officiated and organized by Lane Vanderslice of World Hunger Education Service. It was quite well attended--I'd say around 50 people were there, including several familiar faces, including Randy Albelda of UMass-Boston (and a D&S associate) and Pat Duffy, URPE staffperson. A short but lively discussion period followed. I enjoyed all the talks, but I was particularly excited about David Barkin's reports about solidarity economics activity among indigenous people in rural areas of Mexico.

The only other panel I've had time to visit was another URPE-sponsored panel, on minimum wages. I had hoped to catch the talk by Jeannette Wicks-Lim of the Political Economics Research Institute (she's working on an article for D&S on a related topic) comparing Earned Income Tax Credits vs. minimum wage increases as ways of improving poor people's living standards. I got there too late, but caught an interesting paper by Manuel Pastor of USC profiling immigrant communities in LA.

Our friend Arlene Geiger, econ prof at John Jay College, stopped by the book exhibit booth and reported that she'd gone to some mainstream panels to see what the mood of the profession is about the recession and financial crisis. She reported that one extremely well-attended panel on the financial crisis seemed to indicate that no one in the room thought that the recession would be anything but long and deep. Another packed panel entitled "The Revival of Fiscal Policy" revealed disagreements between Marty Feldstein of Harvard and John Taylor of Stanford about the value of fiscal policy. Janet Yellin of the SF Fed was a discussant (I'm missing a panel on the subprime crisis that she's presiding over right now). I will press Arlene for a fuller report, but the impression she seemed to get was that mainstream economists still have their heads in the sand on the issue of whether government has a role in guiding the economy (even if they can't help but recognize the need for government action in the current crisis).

Frequent D&S blogger Polly Cleveland, of Columbia U., also stopped by the booth. She'd been focusing on sessions on the history of economics, including one on the history of the Chicago School. She promised a full report for the blog.

I'm almost out of time, so I will wrap this up; I promise more coverage soon.

--Chris Sturr, D&S co-editor

Labels: , , , ,

 

1/05/2009 01:28:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Sunday, January 04, 2009

 

Too Much Office Space Spells Big Trouble

by Dollars and Sense

The next big financial time bomb could well be commercial real estate. Vacancy rates have skyrocketed across the country, rental income is down, and many commercial investors will need to refinance massive loans in the still frozen credit markets.

From the NY Times:

Vacancy rates in office buildings exceed 10 percent in virtually every major city in the country and are rising rapidly, a sign of economic distress that could lead to yet another wave of problems for troubled lenders.

With job cuts rampant and businesses retrenching, more empty space is expected from New York to Chicago to Los Angeles in the coming year. Rental income would then decline and property values would slide further. The Urban Land Institute predicts 2009 will be the worst year for the commercial real estate market “since the wrenching 1991-1992 industry depression.”

Banks and other financial companies have not had the problems with commercial properties in this recession that they have had with residential properties. But many building owners, while struggling with more vacancies and less rental income, will need to refinance commercial mortgages this year.

The persistent chill in lending from banks to the credit markets will make that difficult — even for borrowers who are current on their payments — setting the stage for loan defaults.

The prospect bodes ill for banks, along with pension funds, insurance companies, hedge funds and others holding the loans or pieces of them that were packaged and sold as securities.

Jeffrey DeBoer, chief executive of the Real Estate Roundtable, a lobbying group in Washington, is asking for government assistance for his industry and warns of the potential impact of defaults. “Each one by itself is not significant,” he said, “but the cumulative effect will put tremendous stress on the financial sector.”

Stock analysts say commercial real estate is the next ticking time bomb for banks, which have already received hundreds of billions of dollars in capital and other assistance from the federal government. Big banks — like Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley — each hold tens of billions of dollars in commercial real estate securities. The banks also invested directly in properties.

Labels: , ,

 

1/04/2009 09:30:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Saturday, January 03, 2009

 

Stock Market's Loss Means Higher Wages?

by Dollars and Sense

Dean Baker has put forth a provocative claim on his blog:

The lead article in the New Year's Day edition of the Washington Post bemoaned the loss of $6.9 trillion in value in U.S. stock market last year. While those who own large amounts of stock have reason to shed tears, this may end being good news for the rest of us.

The loss of stock wealth means that stockholders have less claim to value of the country's output. The U.S. economy can produce just as much in 2009 as it did in 2008 (in fact somewhat more, because of labor force and productivity growth). If stockholders can demand less because of the reduced value of their stock, then this leaves more for the rest of us.

The most visible evidence of how the loss of stockholder wealth can benefit the rest of us was the sharp decline in consumer prices over the last three months. As a result, real wages rose at almost a 15 percent annual rate in the three months from September through November.

Of course, insofar as the demand generated by stockholders (and homeowners, who have also seen their wealth plummet) is not replaced by other sources, then workers are losing jobs. Eventually weakness in the labor market will put more downward pressure on real wages. However, if the loss of demand from stockholders is effectively replaced by demand from the government or foreign sector, then the vast majority of the country will be made better off by this plunge in stock prices.

The Post should have reporters who understand this fact.

--Dean Baker

Addendum: Since the question has been asked repeatedly, I will try to quickly explain how the fall in stock prices can make non-stockholders wealthier. There are two components to the wealth that people have in stock.

One component is the flow of income in dividends, which is turned based loosely on the growth of corporate profits. If, for the moment we make the unrealistic assumption that the growth in profits is unaffected by the crash (there will be feedback effects as we are seeing -- the plunge in demand that resulted from the stock and housing crash is also leading to declines in profits), then this future flow of dividend income will not be affected.

The second component of wealth is that value of the stock itself. How much can I get for selling my 100 shares of Verizon today. This second component is obviously directly affected by the fall in stock prices. Stockholders will consume based in part on the value of their stock wealth. The logic is that they try to more or less balance their consumption over their lifetime. If they have more wealth, then they can consume more over their lifetime.

To take a simple example, imagine a person is 75 and can expect to live another 10 years, and had $200,000 in stock. Then we might expect this person to spend roughly 10 percent of her wealth or $20,000 a year. Now suppose the market has crashed and her stock is only worth $100,000. Then we would expect her spend just $10,000 a year.

This is what is happening as a result of the stock crash. Stockholders have less wealth and therefore are spending less money on cars, vacations and everything else. The reduction in demand places downward pressure on the price of these goods, making them cheaper for everyone. Those folks who did not have a lot of stock gain in this story, assuming that they hold onto their jobs.

Labels: , , , , ,

 

1/03/2009 02:38:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Friday, January 02, 2009

 

Steel Industry Looking For $1 Trillion

by Dollars and Sense

The next contender in the category of "too big to fail" appears to be Big Steel. Through the first three quarters of 2008, the steel industry was going gangbusters. By late December, however, weekly production had fallen by more than 50% from August levels. Prices have fallen like lead. Tens of thousands of workers, mostly unionized, have been temporarily laid off, with future prospects exceedingly grim. Now industry execs are praying for an Obama miracle of government investment and subsidies.

From the New York Times:

The steel industry, having entered the recession in the best of health, is emerging as a leading indicator of what lies ahead. As steel production goes - and it is now in collapse - so will go the national economy.

That maxim once applied to Detroit's Big Three car companies, when they dominated American manufacturing. Now they are losing ground in good times and bad, and steel has replaced autos as the industry to watch for an early sign that a severe recession is beginning to lift.

The industry itself is turning to government for orders that, until the September collapse, had come from manufacturers and builders. Its executives are waiting anxiously for details of President-elect Barack Obama's stimulus plan, and adding their voices to pleas for a huge public investment program - up to $1 trillion over two years — intended to lift demand for steel to build highways, bridges, electric power grids, schools, hospitals, water treatment plants and rapid transit.


The rest of the article is here.

Labels: ,

 

1/02/2009 11:58:00 PM 2 comments links to this post

 

Manufacturing Lowest In 28 Years

by Dollars and Sense

From the Washington Post

U.S. manufacturing fell sharply in December and reports from abroad showed the same for plants in Europe and Asia, as businesses cut production and slashed product orders in response to the global recession.

The Institute for Supply Management's index of industrial production slipped by 3.8 percentage points in December compared with the month before, to the lowest level since 1980.

The private group's survey of purchasing executives provides a rough guide to whether manufacturing companies are expanding output and receiving increased numbers of orders, or seeing their business decline. The index for December stood at 32.4, compared with 36.2 in November. An index above 50 indicates that manufacturing activity is expanding, while a reading below 50 indicates a decline.

It is the fifth consecutive month that the group's measure of industrial production has stalled, a result consistent with declining consumer demand and economic weakness throughout the United States.

The decline was both deep and broad, the ISM reported: None of the industries covered in the survey reported an expansion in their business, and the drop registered not just in the institute's index of production, but also in its measures of employment, prices and backlogged orders. The group's index of new orders and prices showed them at their lowest levels since the late 1940s.


Rest of article.

Labels:

 

1/02/2009 02:57:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Thursday, January 01, 2009

 

Nasa Scientist: Cap & Trade Not Sufficient

by Dollars and Sense

From The Guardian. N.B: Hansen lambasts the current international approach of setting targets to be met through "cap and trade" schemes as not up to the task. "This approach is ineffectual and not commensurate with the climate threat. It could waste another decade, locking in disastrous consequences for our planet and humanity," the Hansens wrote.


Climate change policies failing, Nasa scientist warns Obama

Award-winning researcher James Hansen says new president's rhetoric must be backed by action

James Randerson, science correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 1 January 2009 15.23 GMT


Current approaches to deal with climate change are ineffectual, one of the world's top climate scientists said today in a personal new year appeal to Barack Obama and his wife Michelle on the urgent need to tackle global warming.

With less than three weeks to go until Obama's inauguration, Prof James Hansen, head of Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, asked the recently appointed White House science adviser Prof John Holdren to pass the missive directly to the president-elect.

Obama spoke repeatedly during his campaign about the need to tackle climate change, and environmentalists fervently hope he will live up to his promises to pursue green policies.

The letter, from Hansen and his wife Anniek, is a personal plea to the first couple. It begins: "We write to you as fellow parents concerned about the Earth that will be inherited by our children, grandchildren, and those yet to be born...Jim has advised governments previously through regular channels. But urgency now dictates a personal appeal."

In a covering letter to Holdren, Hansen explains that he wrote the letter a few weeks ago while in London. His wife had suffered a heart attack ("fortunately we were near a very good hospital") and while they waited for doctors to give the go-ahead to fly back to the US he decided to compose his petition to the new first family.

Hansen has been one of the most prominent advocates of action to tackle climate change since he first spoke on the issue at congressional hearings in the 1980s. His testimony to the senate featured in Al Gore's film An Inconvenient Truth and he has received numerous honours for his work on the issue, including the WWF's top conservation award.

Hansen wrote that there is a "profound disconnect" between public policy on climate change and the magnitude of the problem as described by the science. He praised Obama's campaign rhetoric about "a planet in peril", but said that how the new president responds in office will be crucial. The letter contains a wish list of three policy measures to tackle global warming.

Read the rest of the article

Labels: , ,

 

1/01/2009 02:02:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

 

Trade: Throwing Oil on the Fire

by Dollars and Sense

From The International Herald Tribune. Particularly noteworthy (i.e. scary):

"China will resort to tariff and trade policies to facilitate export of labor-intensive and core technology-supported industries," Li Yizhong, the minister of industry and information technology, said at a conference Dec. 19.
Increased export incentives by China have the potential to create a trade issue for the incoming U.S. administration of Barack Obama, particularly regarding textiles.

China's measures to help exporters are starting to cause concern in other Asian countries that compete with it, and raise the risk of a protectionist reaction against China. Indonesia, one of the largest Asian markets, imposed a series of administrative measures Thursday that were meant to reduce smuggling but will have the practical effect of making it harder to import Chinese goods.

Looks more and more like the crash precipitated in no small part due to reliance on the export model and credit is to be combated by redoubling of key policies of the export model; and this without the credit!




Rising desperation as China's exports drop


International Herald Tribune
By Keith Bradsher
Thursday, January 1, 2009


HONG KONG: At the docks here, the stacks of shipping containers that used to loom above the highway overpass are gone. Logistics managers say they negotiate deeper discounts every week on ships that are leaving half empty.

In nearby Guangdong Province, so many factories are closing without paying employees that some workers are resigning pre-emptively and demanding immediate pay before their employers go bankrupt.

In Sichuan and other interior provinces, municipal officials are desperately searching for ways to provide jobs for millions of out-of-work migrant laborers whose families no longer need them for farming.

Those are the effects of millions of Americans' cutting their spending.

American retailers, after suffering a dismal holiday shopping season, are delaying payment for Chinese goods 90 or even 120 days after shipping, in contrast to the usual 30 to 45 days, requiring their suppliers to try to borrow more money to cover the difference. Some Chinese suppliers who cannot raise the money - many already operate on thin margins - are going out of business.

At the same time, retailers are demanding that exporters show that they have strong balance sheets and will not go bankrupt before completing orders. Exporters, worried the retailers will fail before paying for their purchases, are reluctant to let goods be loaded onto ships. And banks, for the same reason, have cut back on guaranteeing retailers' payments to exporters.

Read the rest of the article

Labels: , , ,

 

1/01/2009 01:44:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

 

Treasury To Aid Array of Firms, Industries

by Dollars and Sense

From Bloomberg (hat tip to Yves Smith)

Treasury Opens Door to Aid for Broad Array of Firms, Industries


By Rebecca Christie

Jan. 1 (Bloomberg) The U.S. Treasury threw the door open to taxpayer financing for a widening array of companies and industries by drafting broad guidelines on aid to the auto industry.

The Treasury's guidelines, published yesterday, would let officials provide funds to any company they deem important to making or financing cars. That leaves room for the government to provide money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program beyond loans already committed to General Motors Corp., GMAC LLC and Chrysler LLC.

"There are going to be other industries that are going to have just as good a case," as the auto companies, former St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President William Poole said in an interview on Bloomberg Television. "We don't know what those other industries are going to be. Where does this process stop?"

Shares of auto suppliers including American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings Inc. and Lear Corp. jumped yesterday after Treasury announced the guidelines. The Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association has been lobbying for the use of federal funds as a backstop in case parts makers can’t collect money the auto manufacturers owe them.

Analysts have speculated that companies such as GM's bankrupt former parts unit Delphi Corp., might be eligible for assistance. The Treasury guidelines may encourage more guessing on what companies and industries are next, said Vincent Reinhart, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington.

'Constructively Ambiguous'

Treasury officials "much prefer discretion, and so they would view the statement as being constructively ambiguous," Reinhart said.

Read the rest of the article

Labels: , ,

 

1/01/2009 01:36:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

 

ASSA and Jet Blue

by Dollars and Sense

Things may be relatively quiet on the D&S blog for the first week of 2009, as our busiest blogger (yours truly, D&S co-editor Chris Sturr) will be at the annual economics meetings, grandiosely named the Allied Social Sciences Association meetings (as if economists were the only social scientists!) in San Francisco.

I am excited to be flying via JetBlue; since they are in the midst of a union drive, with an election coming up soon, maybe I can give the workers some moral support.

If you are going to the ASSA meetings, stop by the ICAPE exhibit table (602(B), I think) to say hello--I will be there hawking D&S books. And stop by the panel I'll be speaking on, sponsored by the Union for Radical Political Economics. Info on the panel (note the august company I'll be in):
Jan. 3, 12:30 pm
URPE
Using Economics for Social Change: Five Organizations Report (A1)

Presiding: LANE VANDERSLICE, World Hunger Education Service

HEIDI HARTMANN, Institute for Women’s Policy Research--Shaping U.S. Policy to Address the Needs of Women and their Families

CHRIS STURR, Dollars and Sense--Bringing Left Economic Analysis to Activists, Students, and the General Public

LAWRENCE MISHEL, Economic Policy Institute--Shaping the US Debate On Policies Affecting Working People Through Empirical and Policy Analysis

KEVIN DANAHER, Global Exchange--Implementing Fair Trade, a Green Economy and Other Steps To Economic Justice

DAVID BARKIN, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco--Principles for Constructing Alternative Socio-Economic Organizations

Discussants:
LANE VANDERSLICE, World Hunger Education Service
JOHN WEEKS, University of London

Happy New Year!

Labels: , ,

 

12/31/2008 04:41:00 PM 0 comments links to this post

 

Contours of Crisis

by Dollars and Sense

We just posted a great web-only article by Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan, co-authors of Capital as Power: A Study of Order and Creorder, RIPE series in Global Political Economy (London and New York: Routledge, forthcoming 2009).

Read the article here.

Labels: , ,

 

12/31/2008 04:38:00 PM 0 comments links to this post


Recent posts:



Blogroll:



Dollars & Sense relies on donations to help balance our budget.
Will you make a tax-deductible contribution today?  Yes  No