The Economics of Trump's War with Iran

Just how much damage will the war and its aftermath inflict on the global economy?

Satellite image of the Strait of Hormuz. Credit: U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), public domain.
Satellite image of the Strait of Hormuz. Credit: U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), public domain.

Why did President Donald Trump initiate his war of choice with Iran? And just how much damage will the war and its aftermath inflict on the global economy? Those are hard questions to answer. The first one is beyond my pay grade—perhaps beyond anyone’s. So let me turn to the second.

This article is from the
May/June 2026 issue.

The ultimate economic cost of Trump’s war with Iran and its aftermath is still uncertain. When asked that question in his mid-March press conference, Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome Powell responded, “The economic effects could be bigger, they could be smaller. We just don’t know.”

But writing in mid-April, we do know that the costs have been devastating, and they will increase even if the temporary ceasefire holds. The cost has been greatest for the Iranian people, who are being collectively punished after already suffering at the hands of a murderous regime.

Let’s look more closely at the economic pain inflicted by the war and the damage done to the global and U.S. economies—and at how a few large companies and well-connected investors have managed to profit from the war.

“Dire Straits”

Iran has heavily disrupted oil tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz since the war began, constraining a route that normally carries about one-fifth of the world’s oil supply. Bloomberg News reports that in January and February 2026, on the eve of the war, global oil flows through the strait averaged 106.9 million barrels per day (bpd). Disruptions reduced shipments by 18.5 million bpd, or 17.2%. However, alternative measures—including diverting some oil away from the strait, releasing oil from international stockpiles, and removing sanctions on Iranian oil already at sea—kept the reduction in supply to 11.1 million bpd, or 10.3%. Even then, that net shortage is larger than the global shortages during the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo, the 1978–1979 Iranian Revolution, or the 1990–1991 Gulf War. In short, we’re in “dire straits,” as the International Energy Agency (IEA) concluded in its March report.

The significant disruption of traffic in the Strait of Hormuz has hit Asian countries especially hard. In the first three months of 2025, Asian countries bought 90% of the oil that passed through the strait. Shortages are already evident across Asia. For instance, restaurants in India are running short of gas cannisters, which now sell at two to three times their usual price. In South Korea and Japan, petrochemical producers have reduced their runs of ethylene gas, which is used in the manufacture of plastics. In China, a Shell-CNOOC (the China National Offshore Oil Corporation) joint venture has suspended its shipments of polyethylene plastic indefinitely. And with skyrocketing prices for jet fuel, several Asian airlines, including Air India and Cathay Pacific (based in Hong Kong), are demanding that customers pay fuel surcharges.

The price of crude oil on the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) market (a global pricing benchmark with a focus on North America) reached a high of $116.26 per barrel on April 7, an increase of 73.9% from February 27, the day before the war began. The price was back down to $92.10 per barrel on April 15. But even its largest price jump fell short of the doubling and near tripling of oil prices during the Arab Oil Embargo and the Iranian Revolution. That’s true despite the fact that the current global oil shortage is greater than in either of those oil crises. The explanation is that today’s economy is less dependent on oil than it was 50 years ago. As economist Paul Krugman points out, the U.S. economy is now four times larger than it was in 1973, but oil consumption is roughly unchanged.

Nonetheless, countries across the globe are facing crippling increases in the price of gasoline and diesel. The figure below shows the price hikes in the hardest-hit country on each continent, ranging from relatively modest increases in the United States—31% for gasoline and 41.8% for diesel—to much sharper increases for the Philippines, at 71.6% and 110.0%, respectively.

No country is exempt from rising crude oil prices in a global market, even the United States, a large oil exporter. For that reason, should the United States continue its blockade of Iranian oil leaving the strait, then not only will global oil prices increase, but so, too, will U.S. gasoline and diesel prices.

There are yet other punishing global shortages due to the war and the disruption of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. Restrictions in the strait have cut off transport of about 20% of the global supply of liquefied natural gas. Hundreds of millions of people rely on liquefied natural gas—which is transported by tanker to distant shores where it is regasified—for power generation, residential heating, cooking, and industrial manufacturing. The closure of the strait has also suspended the movement of roughly 30% of the global supply of ammonia-based nitrogen fertilizer. The global supply of helium has been compromised as well. This byproduct of natural gas production is used to make semiconductors and medical imaging devices. Iran’s drone and missile strikes on a helium hub in Qatar halted production of roughly 30% of the global helium supply.

Jacking Up the Cost of Living

The damage to the U.S economy from the war with Iran is widespread. We should begin with how the war has driven up the cost of living, which was already higher than many households could afford.

Gas prices are above $4 a gallon for the first time since August 2022. On April 15, the average price of a gallon of gas was 37.9% higher than when the war began. (See Table 1.) It was also well above the $3.21 average when Trump took office in January 2025. Higher gas prices disproportionately hurt low-income households. In 2024, 3.4% of the spending of the poorest 20% of households went to buying gas, while that figure was only 2.3% for the richest 20% of households.

It’s a similar story for the price of diesel. On April 15, the price of a gallon of diesel was 49.2% more than its price before the start of the war. That was also considerably more than what consumers paid for diesel at the beginning of Trump’s second term. Higher diesel prices also increase the costs of the trucking industry, which in turn increases costs for food companies, and then food prices. Higher diesel prices also drive up the price of residential heating oil, which is interchangeable with diesel.

The war has pushed up other U.S. prices as well. For instance, 40% of U.S. electricity is generated by natural gas, according to Inside Climate News. With the supply of liquefied natural gas compromised by the war, many people are facing higher utility bills.

Also, about one-third of the global supply of urea, the world’s most widely used nitrogen-based fertilizer, comes from the Persian Gulf area and is derived from natural gas. With the war and the near-closure of the strait, urea is in short supply—and its price on April 15 was 54.7% higher than at the beginning of the war. And about a quarter of U.S. farmers have yet to secure their fertilizer supplies for the upcoming spring planting season, according to Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins. On top of that, higher diesel prices are driving up the cost of operating machinery and transporting crops for farmers.

The increase in jet fuel prices has surpassed most of the other price surges. Jet fuel prices are nearly double what they were at the beginning of the war. Fuel accounts for 40% of airlines’ operating expenses, according to Argus, the airline safety auditing company. And like airlines in Asia, U.S. airlines are also adding fuel-related fees onto the price of tickets.

Finally, the U.S Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose rapidly in March, increasing three times as quickly as it had in February. The inflation rate over the last 12 months reached 3.3%, a large jump from the 2.4% rate in the February CPI report. And in its Economic Outlook Report, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) increased its projected U.S. inflation rate in 2026 from 3.0% to 4.2%.

Troubles for Borrowers and Investors

In addition to higher prices since the war began, bond prices have fallen, driving up interest rates and borrowing costs.

Treasury bonds provide a good example of how this works. To borrow money, the federal government issues Treasury bonds, most often 10-year bonds. Bonds are a promissory note to pay back a fixed amount of money in the future, in this case in 10 years, and the interest rate is the yield of a bond, or what investors make from lending out their money by buying a bond.

U.S. War Scars

“Iran war will scar the global economy” was the title of a March Financial Times editorial. The Iran war has scarred not just the U.S economy but its public sector as well. The U.S. government budget is weighed down by spending to pay for the war, and the Trump administration’s proposed budget would force-feed an already bloated military budget.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies found that the cost of fighting Trump’s war with Iran was $16.5 billion in its first 12 days. That would put the cost of the 39 days of fighting his war before the temporary ceasefire on April 8 at $53.6 billion.

For just a few billion more than that, Congress could have paid the $60 billion needed to renew the enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies for two years instead of letting them expire. Those benefits had gone overwhelmingly to low- and moderate-income households. Without the enhanced benefits, enrollees’ premiums will more than double on average and add 3.8 million people to the uninsured by 2035, according to the Congressional Budget Office. In January, 14% of those enrolled in ACA plans had not paid their first monthly bill. (See John Miller, Health Insurance for 20 Million is at Risk, Left Hook Economics, December 11, 2025.)

The transportation sector accounts for 28% of U.S greenhouse gas emissions, a larger share than any other sector of the economy. Nonetheless, Trump’s so-called 2025 One Big Beautiful Bill eliminated federal tax credits (reductions in taxes owed to the federal government) for individuals and businesses that purchase electric vehicles (EVs). Continuing the program would have cost about $190 billion over the next decade, or $19 billion a year. That’s less than the cost of two weeks of Trump’s war in Iran. And without those tax credits, EV sales have fallen from a high of 200,000 per month in September 2025 to just 75,000 in February 2026. The Princeton Zero Lab projects that, without the subsidies, EV sales will continue to fall through 2030.

Now the Trump administration has come back to Congress asking for another $200 billion to continue its war with Iran. On top of that, Trump’s fiscal year 2027 budget allocates $1.5 trillion to defense spending. That’s more than a 40% increase.

What’s needed now is not increased military spending but to impose a windfall profit tax on those who have made out so handsomely from the war with Iran. In 1980, Congress enacted a windfall profits tax to capture part of the financial gains that U.S oil producers were making from elevated oil prices. It taxed the difference between the sale price of a barrel of oil and its 1979 inflation-adjusted base price. Major integrated oil companies paid a 70% tax rate on their gains, while independent and smaller producers paid lower rates.

Congress should do it again. The revenues collected by a windfall profit tax should go to butter—much-needed social spending programs—not more guns.

The war made bonds less attractive in two ways. It increased economic uncertainty, and higher inflation rates reduced the purchasing power of the money the bond buyer gets paid when the bond matures (in 10 years in this case). The demand for government bonds decreased, the price of 10-year Treasury bonds fell, and the bonds’ yield (or interest rate) increased from 3.97% before the war to as high as 4.44% as it became cheaper to buy bonds. But those higher yields drove up the government’s cost of borrowing. Investors already holding bonds also took a hit, as the resale value of their bonds plummeted.

The same forces drove up the interest rates on home mortgages to above 6% for the first time since February 2022. The interest rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 6.30% on April 16.

Stock markets also took a beating, especially in Asia. The MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International) index of stock prices in eight large Asian economies (including China, South Korea, India, and five others) dropped 14.4% in March. That was the biggest monthly loss since October 2008. Bloomberg News reported that in mid-April the MSCI Asia Pacific Index was still down 4% since the start of the war.

The sell-off in the U.S stock market was less severe. On March 30, the S&P 500 Stock Index was down 7.8%, hitting a six-month low. But not all stockholders took a hit in March. The average price of energy stocks in the S&P 500 was up 5.45% in March. At the same time, the average price of stocks in every other major sector of the economy on the S&P 500 fell. (See sidebar, “War Profiteering,” below.)

War Profiteering

U.S. oil and natural gas companies and their stockholders have profited while U.S consumers strain under the weight of higher prices. The biggest winners from rising energy stock prices were the largest integrated oil companies, including ExxonMobil, Shell, and Chevron.

Rystad Energy, a market research firm, estimated that integrated oil producers in the United States had already raked in $63 billion in sales before oil prices soared past $100 a barrel in the third week of March. Should the price of crude oil average $100 a barrel, then the sales figure would jump to $162 billion.

But those windfall profits haven’t reached other smaller companies that do business in just one stage of the oil supply chain, such as drilling, refining, or fuel sales. The drillers in the major U.S. oil and gas-producing regions have been reluctant to increase output because they are uncertain if higher oil revenues from the war will continue. And oil field service firms are saddled with higher costs from Trump’s tariffs on steel, machinery components, and equipment. Retailers selling the already extracted and refined oil are coping with volatile prices and supply constraints.

Market speculators who seemed to have a heads up about Trump’s recent announcements have also made out like bandits. For instance, at 7:04 a.m. Eastern time on March 23, President Trump posted a message on Truth Social announcing that he had deferred strikes on Iran and had begun “productive conversations” with the Iranian government to put an end to the war. But at 6:50 a.m., some 14 minutes earlier, a group of traders sold 6,200 contracts for oil futures (bets that the price of crude oil would rise) and collected $580 million. And just five minutes prior to Trump’s announcement, investors bought $1.5 billion in Standard & Poor’s stock futures (bets that stock prices would rise).

With Trump’s announcement, the price of oil futures fell, the market price of a barrel of oil dropped, and stock futures and stock prices surged. And investors who sold oil futures and bought stock futures just prior to Trump’s announcement made a killing.

Democratic Senator Chris Murphy called the spike in trading “mind-blowing corruption,” convinced that the move relied on illegal insider trading (buying or selling a tradeable financial asset such as stocks or bonds to one’s own advantage through having access to confidential information). And while not yet proven, there is every reason to believe Murphy got it right. (See John Miller, Profiting in Oil Futures Made Easy (to Understand), Left Hook Economics, March 27.)

In April, stock prices rose with the announcement of a temporary ceasefire and the prospect of opening the strait to more oil tanker traffic. By April 15, the S&P 500 Index was 1.8% higher than it had been when the war began. But the jump in stock prices elicited warnings that investors are underestimating the economic damage from the Iran war, which IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva called “already quite significant.” She added that “it will take some time for the recovery to kick in.”

The Stench of Stagflation

Finally, let’s look at how much Trump’s war of choice is likely to damage the U.S. macroeconomy.

The 50 economists surveyed by the Wall Street Journal in mid-March put the probability of a recession in the next 12 months at 32%. Another 47 economists surveyed by the Financial Times predicted that U.S. economic growth would slow by one-quarter to one-half of a percentage point if the price of crude oil remained at $100 a barrel. And in mid-March economist Paul Krugman, in his Substack blog, detected a “Whiff of Stagflation.” Still he cautioned that the underlying conditions in today’s economy are less prone to stagflation than those during the 1973 oil embargo, which tipped the U.S. economy into a recession and brought on double-digit inflation rates.

Seven weeks into the war, that whiff of stagflation has become a stench. Access to the Strait of Hormuz has been dramatically reduced, prices remain elevated, and uncertainty mounts as the actions of the Trump administration have become increasingly erratic. Even with the temporary ceasefire, the war and its aftermath still threaten to trigger a downturn in the U.S. economy or a period of prolonged stagnation with inflated prices.

To begin with, knocking a half of a percentage point off the projected U.S. economic growth is no small thing in an economy that grew just 0.5% in the last three months of 2025. In addition, Trump’s crackdown on immigration will reduce the U.S. economic growth rate in 2026 by as much as 0.32 of a percentage point, according to a recent Brookings Institution study.

Also, today’s labor market is far more dysfunctional than it was in 1973. Ever since Trump’s April 2025 announcement of his draconian tariffs, job-creation has stalled. The labor market added only 15,000 jobs a month in 2025. In 1973, the labor market added more than 250,000 jobs a month to a far smaller labor force.

On top of that, extreme inequality has contributed to the fragility of today’s economy. In 2024, close to half of the national income (46.8%) went to the top 10%, while just 13.4% went to the bottom 50%. That difference was two-and-a-half times larger than it was in 1973. And the richest 10% of households, the same group that holds the vast majority of stock, accounted for nearly half (49.2%) of consumer spending in the second quarter of 2025, according to Moody’s Analytics economist Mark Zandi. The increased volatility of stock prices puts not just the wealth of the richest 10% at risk but also the consumer spending necessary to sustain economic growth.

The likelihood of an economic downturn or a stagflation malaise will not disappear even if the current fragile ceasefire manages to open up the Strait of Hormuz. Speaking in mid-April at the Atlantic Council Energy Forum held in Washington, D.C., IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol warned that a recovery could take as long as two years. He added that, “Prices are already high, but they are not reflecting the severity of
the problem.”

Sources: David Rovella, “Oil Prices Have Higher to Go, IEA Warns,” Bloomberg Newsletter, April 13, 2026; Lauren Aratani, “War in Iran is boosting profits for oil and defense companies as US gas prices soar,” The Guardian, April 6, 2026 (theguardian.com); Bloomberg News, “The Strait of Hormuz Oil Shock is Now Heading West,” March 30, 2026 (bloomberg.com); Business Recorder, “Asian stocks log steepest monthly decline since 2008,” April 1, 2026 (brecorder.com); Mark Cancian and Chris Park, “Iran War Cost Estimate Update: $11.3 Billion at Day 6, $16.5 Billion at Day 12,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, March 13, 2026 (csis.org); Anthony DeBarros and Justin Lahart, “Economists Don’t See a Recession Unless Oil Hits $138—and Stays There for Weeks,” Wall Street Journal, March 19, 2026 (wsj.com); The Editorial Board, “Iran War will scar the global economy,” Financial Times, March 20, 2026 (ft.com); Lindsay Ellis, Marcus Weisgerber, and Gavin Bade, “Trump Seeks $1.5 Trillion for the Military,” Wall Street Journal, April 3, 2026; EveryCRSReport.com, “The Crude Oil Windfall Profit Tax of the 1980s: Implications for Current Energy Policy,” March 9, 2006 (everycrsreport.com); International Energy Agency, “Oil Market Report—March 2026,” March 12, 2026 (iea.org); Jesse Jenkins, “Potential Impacts of Electric Vehicle Tax Credit Repeal on US Vehicle Market and Manufacturing,” Princeton University ZERO Lab, March 10, 2025 (princeton.edu); Claire Jones, Myles McCormick, and George Steer, “Federal Reserve chief Jay Powell says Iran oil crisis will worsen US inflation,” Financial Times, March 18, 2026; Spencer Kimball, “The U.S.-Iran war is the biggest supply disruption in history,” CNBC, March 9, 2025 (cnbc.com); Paul Krugman, “Oil Crises, Past and Possibly Future,” Substack, March 8, 2026 (substack.com); Paul Krugman, “Whiff of Stagflation,” Substack, March 19, 2026 (paulkrugman.substack.com); LegalClarity Team, “Who Created the Windfall Profits Tax for Oil Companies?” LegalClarity, November 25, 2025 (legalclarity.org); Anna Wilde Mathews, “Millions of Americans Are Going Uninsured Following Expiration of ACA Subsidies,” Wall Street Journal, March 19, 2026; Myles McCormick et al, “Soaring fuel prices to cast long shadow across US economy,” Financial Times, March 10, 2026; Aaron McMillan, “The Supply Lines Worst Hit by the Strait of Hormuz Closure,” Procurement Magazine, March 27, 2026 (procurementmag.com); MSCI, “MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index (USD),” March 2026 (msci.com); OECD, OECD Economic Outlook Interim Report, March 2026, March 26, 2026 (oecd.org); Tsvetana Paraskova, “$100 Oil Could Deliver $63 Surge to U.S. Shale,” Yahoo! Finance, March 16, 2026 (yahoo.com); Kiley Rose, “How Will the War in Iran Affect Your Utility Bills,” Inside Climate News, March 5, 2026 (insideclimatenews.org); Alisha Sachdev, Nicholas Lua, and Will Kubzansky, “Iran War Catapults Asia to Energy Crisis,” Bloomberg News, March 15, 2026; Susannah Savage, “Fertiliser price surge due to Iran war coincides with U.S. planting season,” Financial Times, March 26, 2026; S&P Dow Jones Indices, “U.S. Sector Dashboard,” March 31, 2026 (spglobal.com); Sarah Shamin and Reuters, “Helium hitch,” Al Jazeera, March 26, 2026 (aljazeera.com); David Shepardson and Kalea Hall, “Automakers unveil new EVs for US market despite sales downturn,” Reuters, April 2, 2026 (reuters.com); Molly Smith and Chris Anstey, “US Wraps Up Worst Non-Recession Year for Hiring Since 2003,” Bloomberg News, February 11, 2026; Jamie Smyth and Malcolm Moore, “US oil groups in line for $63bn windfall from Gulf war disruption,” Financial Times, March 14, 2026; Tara Suter, “Trump says rising oil prices ‘a very small price to pay’ for ‘safety and peace’,” The Hill, March 8, 2026 (thehill.com); Trading Economics, “Crude Oil WTI,” March 2026 (tradingeconomics.com); U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Consumer Price Index News Release,” April 10, 2026 (bls.gov); Wall Street Journal, “The U.S. Economy Depends More Than Ever on Rich People,” Feb. 23, 2025; Marcus Weisgerber, Anvee Bhutani, and Olivia Beavers, “Pentagon Seeks $200 Billion to Fund War,” Wall Street Journal, March 19, 2026; Robin Wigglesworth, “Demand destruction has begun,” Financial Times, March 19, 2026; Tara Wilson, “The impact of Immigrants on the U.S. economy,” Brookings Research, March 30, 2026 (brookings.edu); World Inequality Database, “Income Inequality: Top 10% Share, Bottom 50% share” (wid.world); Peter Santilli and Anthony DeBarros, “The Cost of War: How Economists Predict the Economy Will Fare,” Wall Street Journal, April 15, 2026; “The IEA Has a Warning Markets Haven’t Priced Yet : Crisis Is Still Ahead,” European Business Magazine, April 14, 2026 (europeanbusinessmagazine.com); Shawn Donnan and Jorgelina Do Rosario, “Markets Are Too Blase on War’s Economic Toll, Policymakers Warn,” Bloomberg, April 15, 2026; Anna Wilde Matthews, “Around 14% of Enrollees in ACA Plan Failed to Make Payments, Data Shows,” Wall Street Journal, April 15,2026.

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Dollars & Sense.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.