D&S Blog Single Post

Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right

By Polly Cleveland

When I was a teenage bookworm, and later a student at Harvard and Berkeley, I looked down on what my dad called “The Great Unwashed”. By this unfortunate Victorian term, he meant the ignorant, the prejudiced, the parochial and especially the hyper-patriotic politicians who made his life difficult as a Foreign Service officer. So it would still be easy for me today to look down on members of the American right, especially the Tea Party supporters of Donald Trump.

Arlie Hochschild, a retired sociology professor at U.C. Berkeley, has spent five years interviewing and becoming friends with Tea Party supporters in Louisiana. As she puts it, she has been trying to climb over the “empathy wall,” to “turn off the alarm bells”, in order to understand how her friends view the world. Her new book, Strangers in Their Own Land, should be essential reading for Democratic politicians from Hillary on down, as well as for elite snobs like me. She has also written a revealing article for the September issue of Mother Jones.

Hochschild addresses what she calls the Great Paradox: why would the residents of “cancer alley” one of the most polluted places in the United States—nonetheless oppose environmental regulations? Her friends are well aware of the pollution and many have suffered personally in health and destruction of their beloved neighborhoods. Yet other concerns seem to take priority. First, there’s a loathing of government, federal government especially. Government takes their taxes and does nothing for them. The government of Louisiana is captive to the oil companies. Since the oil companies at least provide good (though few) jobs, they blame government instead. Another concern is honor and respect. All their lives, Hochschild’s friends have worked hard, gone to church, and helped their neighbors. They deeply resent the coastal elites who say they “cling to guns or religion”, or call them rednecks, racists, bigots, sexists, xenophobes and now “deplorables.”

Hochschild describes what she finds to be the “deep story” of the right:

You are patiently standing in the middle of a long line stretching toward the horizon, where the American Dream awaits. But as you wait, you see people cutting in line ahead of you. Many of these line-cutters are black—beneficiaries of affirmative action or welfare. Some are career-driven women pushing into jobs they never had before. Then you see immigrants, Mexicans, Somalis, the Syrian refugees yet to come. As you wait in this unmoving line, you’re being asked to feel sorry for them all. You have a good heart. But who is deciding who you should feel compassion for? Then you see President Barack Hussein Obama waving the line-cutters forward. He’s on their side. In fact, isn’t he a line-cutter too? How did this fatherless black guy pay for Harvard? As you wait your turn, Obama is using the money in your pocket to help the line-cutters. He and his liberal backers have removed the shame from taking. The government has become an instrument for redistributing your money to the undeserving. It’s not your government anymore; it’s theirs.

What makes this deep story ring true? Hochschild asks. Her friends are older, white middle class—more than half of Tea Party supporters earn at least $50,000. But their position is precarious. All around them they see people falling into poverty, despair, and worst of all, dependence on government handouts. So while the liberal media sneers, Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and now Donald Trump hear and validate the deep story. That’s why a woman friend of Hochschild’s can say of Trump, “He’s a jerk, but I like some of what he says.”

At a recent book-signing in New York, Hochschild told us she invites Hillary to come meet her friends in Louisiana. When we learn to listen, even if we don’t agree, we will find areas in common. Notably, her friends support reducing pollution and getting money out of politics.

Taking a broader perspective, I can’t help noticing how the deep story of waiting in line resembles the zero-sum mentality of very unequal, low-mobility societies. The British Equality Trust has developed an index relating inequality to social and health problems. Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama are way up there on the scale of both. The emphasis on honor and respect also fits the pattern. If there’s little mobility, one’s position in the hierarchy becomes very important. Think of gang-infested poor neighborhoods, where one can get killed for “disrespecting,” or where a kid who does well in school is teased and harassed. Think also of India, where the caste system remains intractable in many regions, and Pakistan where it’s acceptable to kill a daughter who destroys the family honor by marrying without permission.

My brother is a Republican, though not a Tea Partier. He can deluge me with facts supporting his positions. It’s excruciatingly difficult to “turn off the alarm bells” and listen for feelings and points of agreement. Arlie Hochschild has motivated me to try harder. She reminds all of us that, regardless of disagreements, we still owe Tea Party supporters our full respect, readiness to listen, and willingness to work together where we can.


  1. An excellent article by Polly Cleveland. Her synopsis adds to my admiration for Arlie Hochschild, who has written many books that show how change is affecting different parts of society.
    Barack Obama became President in part because he listened to the people whom Hochschild now gives voice to. He was the first Democrat in decades to set up campaign offices in rural areas and to pay attention to the issues raised there. Hillary and Bernie both returned to the standard pattern and wrote off rural voters. If only for the sake of the survival of the Democratic Party, it is time for its leaders to listen to people who have been ignored.
    Ralph Nader’s recent book, Unstoppable, proposes the creation of temporary alliances that would cross traditional boundaries between Left and Right. Even though those measures will be difficulty, they are only a beginning.
    It would be even more valuable if political theorists could begin to fashion new ways of thinking about the role of government. The alternatives would fit neither the progressive model of public management that creates friction by applying uniform rules to diverse conditions nor the libertarian model of minimum government that refuses to recognize obvious cases where private markets fail to solve problems. If a new model is truly possible, it will require being open to ideas from people who have been ignored by liberal elites. Hochschild may have opened the door to a new unifying force in American politics that is more than just a compromise between Left and Right, but something genuinely novel.

  2. Thanks, Cliff
    Arlie Hochschild shows it’s possible to communicate across the barrier of very different assumptions about government. However, that barrier itself arises from the Tea Party’s correct perception that government is increasingly rigged against them, causing worsening stagnation below the top 10%. That is Joseph Stiglitz’s thesis (https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-candidacy-message-to-political-leaders-by-joseph-e–stiglitz-2016-10), which motivates his campaign to Rewrite the Rules of taxes and regulation. (http://rooseveltinstitute.org/rewrite-rules/). If we’re to have any hope of rewriting the rules, we have to work with the Tea Party on areas where we agree, starting with too much money in politics.

Leave a Reply

D&S Categories


Dollars & Sense
P.O. Box 209,
Portsmouth, NH 03802
Phone: (617) 447-2177
Fax: (617) 447-2179
Email us.

© 2021

%d bloggers like this: