<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Abandoning EFCA? Not yet.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dollarsandsense.org/blog/2008/12/obama-abandoning-efca-not-yet.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dollarsandsense.org/blog/2008/12/obama-abandoning-efca-not-yet.html</link>
	<description>The Blog for Dollars &#38; Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisconsin Shows Failure of Democrats to Back Pro-Labor Reforms &#171; Talking Union</title>
		<link>http://dollarsandsense.org/blog/2008/12/obama-abandoning-efca-not-yet.html/comment-page-1#comment-3291</link>
		<dc:creator>Wisconsin Shows Failure of Democrats to Back Pro-Labor Reforms &#171; Talking Union</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 03:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dandsblog.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/obama-abandoning-efca-not-yet#comment-3291</guid>
		<description>[...] With Obama, labor came prepared with a clear legislative focus: the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which included card check neutrality and other important reforms. Obama vowed to support it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With Obama, labor came prepared with a clear legislative focus: the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which included card check neutrality and other important reforms. Obama vowed to support it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisconsin Shows Failure of Democrats to Back Pro-Labor Reforms &#124; The Activist</title>
		<link>http://dollarsandsense.org/blog/2008/12/obama-abandoning-efca-not-yet.html/comment-page-1#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>Wisconsin Shows Failure of Democrats to Back Pro-Labor Reforms &#124; The Activist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dandsblog.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/obama-abandoning-efca-not-yet#comment-3285</guid>
		<description>[...] With Obama, labor came prepared with a clear legislative focus: the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which included card check neutrality and other important reforms. Obama vowed to support it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With Obama, labor came prepared with a clear legislative focus: the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which included card check neutrality and other important reforms. Obama vowed to support it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dollars and Sense</title>
		<link>http://dollarsandsense.org/blog/2008/12/obama-abandoning-efca-not-yet.html/comment-page-1#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Dollars and Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dandsblog.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/obama-abandoning-efca-not-yet#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Hmm--how is this disenfranchisement? If 50% + 1 sign cards, they--the majority--are voting to unionize. Sounds like enfranchisement to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8211;how is this disenfranchisement? If 50% + 1 sign cards, they&#8211;the majority&#8211;are voting to unionize. Sounds like enfranchisement to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://dollarsandsense.org/blog/2008/12/obama-abandoning-efca-not-yet.html/comment-page-1#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dandsblog.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/obama-abandoning-efca-not-yet#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Maybe as Obama learns more about EFCA, he likes it less.  Fact: with EFCA if 50% + 1 of the employees sign cards, the remaining 49% have no say in the matter.  None.  This is criminal disenfranchisement.  This is EFCA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe as Obama learns more about EFCA, he likes it less.  Fact: with EFCA if 50% + 1 of the employees sign cards, the remaining 49% have no say in the matter.  None.  This is criminal disenfranchisement.  This is EFCA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

